udemy_click

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are supplied, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, and it gives almost nothing: it does not say whether a click navigates to a new page, mutates server state, triggers async loading, or requires a subsequent udemy_read to re-number elements. For a browser-automation click with no annotation coverage, that leaves the agent guessing about side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One tight sentence with the action front-loaded and no filler. It is efficient, though the brevity is partly the source of the missing behavioral detail rather than pure economy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and no description of post-click state, an agent cannot tell whether the click changes the page and invalidates element numbering. For a stateful browser tool the definition is under-specified relative to its complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the single parameter is already fully documented including the 'from the last read' provenance. The description reinforces the 'numbered element on the current page' framing but adds no new detail such as range limits or what happens with a stale index. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (click) and object (numbered element on the current Udemy page), which clearly separates it from siblings like udemy_type and udemy_read. It stops short of naming those siblings explicitly, so differentiation relies on the agent inferring intent from the verb.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

"Numbered element" plus the schema note "Element number from the last read" implies the prerequisite that a read must happen first and that a page must be current/open. There is no explicit statement of when to choose click over udemy_type or udemy_open, and no exclusion or failure guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.