Skip to main content
Glama
Trainerize MCP Server

Trainerize MCP Server

trainerize_click

Click a numbered element on the current Trainerize page to interact with buttons, links, or controls identified by a prior read.

Instructions

Click a numbered element on the current Trainerize page.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "element": "<element>"
    },
    "name": "trainerize_click"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
elementYesElement number from the last read.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.1.0

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of explaining behavior. It discloses the current-page scope and that element numbers are tied to the last read, but it does not say what clicking does, whether it navigates or mutates state, or what happens if the index is stale.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no unnecessary wording. It is appropriately sized for a simple click tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter click tool, the description covers the essential prerequisite of using element numbers from the last read. However, with no annotations and no output schema, it should say more about the effect of clicking and error conditions to be fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is one parameter with full schema description coverage, so the schema already explains that 'element' is the number from the last read. The description adds no additional meaning beyond that baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: clicking a numbered element on the current Trainerize page. It is clearly distinguishable from read, type, open, and close siblings, though it does not explicitly name an alternative tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the reference to the 'current Trainerize page' and the schema note that numbers come 'from the last read,' which suggests a prior read is required. However, the description gives no explicit when-to-use guidance, alternatives, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.