Skip to main content
Glama
Systeme.io MCP server for sales and pages

Systeme.io MCP server for sales and pages

systeme_io_close

Closes the Systeme.io browser session once your work is finished so session credits stop accumulating. Use it to end tasks and prevent ongoing credit usage.

Instructions

Close the Systeme.io browser session when the work is done, so credits stop running.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "systeme_io_close"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.1.0

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It usefully discloses the cost model ('credits stop running'), which is genuine context an agent cannot infer from an empty schema, but says nothing about idempotency, what happens if no session is open, or what the call returns.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single tight sentence that front-loads the action and appends the reason. Nothing is wasted, though the rationale clause is the only supporting detail present.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-argument session-teardown tool with no output schema, the definition covers the action and its motivating consequence. Minor gaps remain around failure modes and whether teardown is required or optional, but nothing essential to calling it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate; baseline 4 applies. No parameter-related claims are made or needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Names a specific verb and resource: closing the Systeme.io browser session. It is unambiguously distinguishable from systeme_io_open, though it never names that sibling or any other explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides a clear trigger condition — 'when the work is done' — which is exactly the decision point an agent needs. It stops short of stating exclusions (e.g., don't close mid-workflow or before reading results), so it does not reach the 5 tier.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.