Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
SmugMCP

SmugMCP

by cotlet-connect
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

smugmug_click

Clicks a numbered element on the current SmugMug page, using the element number from the last read, to trigger the intended action.

Instructions

Click a numbered element on the current SmugMug page.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "element": "<element>"
    },
    "name": "smugmug_click"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
elementYesElement number from the last read.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.1.0

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are supplied, so the description must carry the behavioral burden. It only states that a click occurs on the current page; it does not mention side effects, navigation, whether a prior smugmug_read is required, error behavior, or what constitutes the current page.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with verb and object, with no redundant wording. The size is appropriate for a simple one-parameter action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter click tool, the description plus schema is enough to know what input is required. However, with no annotations and no output schema, it omits behavioral context about clicking, such as navigation or side effects, and does not explicitly state the prior-read prerequisite beyond what the schema implies.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the schema already describes 'element' as 'Element number from the last read.' The description's phrase 'numbered element' is consistent and slightly reinforces the schema, but adds no format or validation meaning beyond it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific action verb ('Click') and resource ('numbered element on current SmugMug page'), making the purpose unambiguous. It does not explicitly differentiate from siblings such as smugmug_type, but the verb/resource combination is distinct.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used to activate an element identified by number from a prior read, but it does not explicitly state prerequisites or when to choose smugmug_type versus smugmug_click. Guidance is inferable but not spelled out.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools