google_search_console_close

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full disclosure burden. It does well to surface the billing consequence (credits stop running), which an agent genuinely could not infer, but it omits error/idempotency behavior — e.g. what happens if no session is open or if a call is repeated — and whether browser state is persisted or discarded.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with the action first and the motivation second. No redundant restatement of the name or title, and nothing an agent must read past.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-argument session teardown with no output schema and no annotations, the description covers purpose, timing, and cost impact. The only meaningful gap is the lack of any statement about behavior when no session exists, which matters for a close operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate; the schema is fully specified with additionalProperties false. Baseline 4 applies for a parameterless tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (close) and resource (Google Search Console browser session), and adds the operational consequence (credits stop running). It is clearly distinguishable from the sibling tools that open, read, click, and type into the session.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

"When the work is done" gives a clear trigger condition for calling it. There are no explicit exclusions or named alternatives, but with a zero-parameter teardown tool paired against open/read/click/type siblings, the choice is unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.