Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Eversports Studio Manager MCP Server

Eversports Studio Manager MCP Server

by cotlet-connect
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

eversports_studio_manager_read

Read the current Eversports Studio Manager page to capture its text and numbered buttons, links, and fields, with an optional element filter for focused inspection.

Instructions

Read the current Eversports Studio Manager page: its text and numbered buttons, links and fields.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "eversports_studio_manager_read"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
elementNoRead only inside this element.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.1.0

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It discloses the returned page content, which is useful behavioral context, but does not explicitly state that the operation is read-only, whether the page must already be open, or any error behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is a single front-loaded sentence that states the action and the content returned. There is no unnecessary wording or restatement.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read tool with one optional, fully documented parameter and no output schema, the description gives enough detail about what is returned. It could mention the element-scoped read or prerequisites, but those are minor gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole optional parameter is fully documented in the schema as reading only inside the specified element. The description does not mention the element parameter, but schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: read the current Eversports Studio Manager page, including its text, numbered buttons, links, and fields. It is clear what the tool does, though it does not explicitly differentiate itself from sibling tools such as click or type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used to inspect the current page, but it gives no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance relative to alternatives. The presence of sibling tools like click and type makes the intended inspection role inferable, but not stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools