Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
DaySmart MCP server

DaySmart MCP server

by cotlet-connect
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

daysmart_read

Read the current DaySmart page’s text, numbered buttons, links, and fields—optionally within one element—to inspect account data.

Instructions

Read the current DaySmart page: its text and numbered buttons, links and fields.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "daysmart_read"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
elementNoRead only inside this element.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.1.0

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations present, the description carries the full burden; it does disclose the shape of the returned content (text, numbered buttons, links, fields), which is valuable. It says nothing about behavior on a large page (truncation/pagination), what happens if no page is open, or that the operation is non-mutating beyond the inference from 'read'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One front-loaded sentence with zero filler; the colon-list of returned content is efficient. Slight ambiguity in the mixed list phrasing ('its text and numbered buttons, links and fields') is the only flaw.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

A simple read tool with one optional, fully documented parameter and no output schema, so the description rightly spends its words describing returned content. Missing only page-state preconditions and any note on result size limits.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single optional 'element' parameter, which already explains scoping the read to one element. The description adds no further meaning about the parameter, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('read') and resource ('the current DaySmart page') and enumerates what comes back: text, numbered buttons, links, fields. That distinguishes it from daysmart_click/type/open siblings, though it never explicitly contrasts with them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied by the word 'current' — read whatever page is open, typically before clicking a numbered element. There is no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or named alternative such as daysmart_open for navigating first.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools