Skip to main content
Glama
CoachingPortal MCP Server

CoachingPortal MCP Server

coachingportal_close

Close the active CoachingPortal browser session when work is done to stop credit usage.

Instructions

Close the CoachingPortal browser session when the work is done, so credits stop running.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "coachingportal_close"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.1.0

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the load; it does disclose the consequential behavior — session teardown halts credit consumption — which is the key fact an agent needs. It does not address idempotency, the effect of closing an already-closed session, or any resulting state, leaving real gaps for a mutation/lifecycle tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, front-loaded with the action and followed by the reason. No filler, no repetition of the tool name without adding meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, no-output-schema lifecycle tool this covers what it does and why it matters. The only meaningful omission is behavior on a non-existent session, which is minor at this complexity level.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate; baseline applies. The description correctly avoids inventing arguments that the empty schema would reject.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Close the CoachingPortal browser session') with a rationale attached. It is readily distinguishable from the lifecycle siblings (open, click, read, type, status) even though none is named.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit trigger condition ('when the work is done') plus the motivation that credits stop running, which implicitly tells the agent not to leave sessions hanging. It stops short of stating what to do if no session is active, so it is clear context rather than a full when/when-not rubric.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.