A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceEnables MCP-capable agents to generate and edit images through Gemini or OpenAI, returning an absolute file path instead of image bytes to keep context windows clean.
1
MIT
museav-mcp
by cortexos-dev
Related Servers
Alternatives to museav-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables WorkBuddy and other MCP-compatible clients to generate images and videos from natural-language prompts through Agnes AI, returning online URLs and locally saved files.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes litmedia.ai text-to-image and image-to-video generation tools via MCP, enabling AI agents to generate images and videos directly from prompts.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents and MCP clients to generate, edit, and post-process images directly into a project, with text-to-image, instruction-based editing with masks and reference images, plus local resize, crop, and format conversion and dimension inspection tools.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceImage tools for coding agents: generate from text, edit one reference image, remove backgrounds, upscale 2x, and create reference-based sprite animations. The MCP server, CLI and REST API share one key, credit balance and request history. Needs a DreamLayer API key and paid credits; sprite sheets are beta.777 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to generate and edit images via Gemini, OpenAI, or BytePlus Seedream, with automatic prompt optimization and quality presets, saving outputs to disk and returning them as MCP resources.2,138 npmMIT
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 4 tools
Disambiguation4/5
The three writing tools split along a clear workflow: lint detects mechanical violations, rubric is a static reference of platform scoring rules, and compose generates prompt constraints. Lint vs. rubric could be momentarily confused since both are 'check my text against rules', but the descriptions frame one as automated scanning with line numbers and the other as a manual checklist. groups_list is unmistakably a meta/introspection tool.
Naming Consistency4/5
All lowercase snake_case with an action-oriented second token, so naming is readable and predictable. The three writing_* tools share a clean domain prefix, while groups_list is a noun_verb outlier that breaks the domain_action pattern.
Tool Count4/5
Four tools is lean but defensible for a focused writing-quality server: one generates, one checks, one provides reference criteria, plus a discovery tool. Nothing is redundant, though the surface is thin enough that the single meta tool feels like it belongs to a larger, uninstalled product.
Completeness3/5
The compose → lint → rubric loop is covered, but rubric is a passive reference with no tool to actually score a draft against it, and there is no update/fix operation to apply the lint suggestions. The presence of groups_list implies additional capability groups exist outside this server, so the visible surface is intentionally partial.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessSyncing