A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage LoRaWAN devices on Actility ThingPark, allowing device listing, details, and downlink command sending via natural language.
MIT
Milesight Gateway MCP Server
by corgan2222
Related Servers
Alternatives to Milesight Gateway MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLets AI agents manage LoRaWAN networks and debug devices live over ChirpStack's native gRPC API, including downlink queuing, event monitoring, and payload codec iteration.4026 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables natural language interaction with Connhex IoT platform APIs for managing devices, telemetry, rules, and resources via MCP tools.301MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language management of apps, services, resources, attributes, and data via the Dimetrics API with full CRUD operations and advanced filtering.-
dSIPRouter MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage dSIPRouter operations such as endpoint groups, carrier groups, inbound mappings, and call data retrieval through natural language.Apache 2.0- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables managing Netris network fabric through natural language, including VPCs, BGP sessions, load balancers, NAT rules, IPAM, and other network operations.-
TDQS
B3.3/5.0
Scored across 34 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a clear and distinct resource and action (e.g., create_application vs. create_device), with no overlapping purposes. Operations like enqueue_downlink are differentiated by target (device vs. multicast group).
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., list_applications, update_profile, remove_device_from_multicast_group). No mixing of conventions or vague verbs.
Tool Count4/5
With 34 tools, the set is on the higher end but justified by the breadth of resources managed (applications, devices, profiles, multicast groups, packets, etc.). Each tool serves a specific purpose without redundancy.
Completeness4/5
The tools provide full CRUD for four main resource types plus specialized operations for downlink and multicast management. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for managing service profiles), but the core gateway management workflow is well-covered.