Skip to main content
Glama
corgan2222

Milesight Gateway MCP Server

by corgan2222
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Milesight Gateway MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-server-thingpark

      tookta91
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage LoRaWAN devices on Actility ThingPark, allowing device listing, details, and downlink command sending via natural language.
      MIT

    • dimetrics-mcp-server

      fellnerd
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language management of apps, services, resources, attributes, and data via the Dimetrics API with full CRUD operations and advanced filtering.
      -

    • Netris MCP Server

      iamjarvs
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables managing Netris network fabric through natural language, including VPCs, BGP sessions, load balancers, NAT rules, IPAM, and other network operations.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 34 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clear and distinct resource and action (e.g., create_application vs. create_device), with no overlapping purposes. Operations like enqueue_downlink are differentiated by target (device vs. multicast group).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., list_applications, update_profile, remove_device_from_multicast_group). No mixing of conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 34 tools, the set is on the higher end but justified by the breadth of resources managed (applications, devices, profiles, multicast groups, packets, etc.). Each tool serves a specific purpose without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools provide full CRUD for four main resource types plus specialized operations for downlink and multicast management. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for managing service profiles), but the core gateway management workflow is well-covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources