Skip to main content
Glama
corbat-tech

corbat

Official
by corbat-tech
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to corbat

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Policy Gatekeeper

      GILSMON
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides real-time policy enforcement for AI coding agents by intercepting and validating their actions against organizational standards like naming conventions, security policies, and compliance rules before execution. Prevents violations through immediate feedback and auto-correction suggestions.
      5
      -

    • ForgeCraft

      jghiringhelli
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a quality framework and enforceable conventions for AI coding assistants, ensuring code quality, environment hygiene, and project standards across multiple AI tools.
      60 npm
      3
      -

    • sdlc-mcp

      Osucha
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to enforce a software delivery standard by validating artifacts against declarative rules, providing templates, glossary terms, and pass/fail verdicts with actionable blockers.
      8
      MIT

    • sentrik

      maxgerhardson
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding agents with real-time access to compliance rules, scan results, and remediation guidance to enforce coding standards and security policies on generated code.
      -

    • Laguarde

      FuturPanda
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to evaluate actions against team-defined policies, record decisions, and obtain human approvals for potentially risky operations.
      88 npm
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a unique and clearly defined purpose: get_context for standards, health for server status, init for configuration, profiles for listing profiles, search for documentation, validate for code analysis, and verify for final validation. No overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a simple, consistent pattern of lowercase verbs or verb_noun (e.g., get_context, validate, verify). There is no mixing of conventions or ambiguous names.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, the set is well-scoped for the server's purpose of coding standards and quality assistance. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of the workflow without being too few or excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core workflow: acquiring standards, validating code, and final verification. A minor gap is the absence of an automated fix tool, but the iterative validate-and-fix workflow compensates.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources