toggl-focus-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to toggl-focus-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for Productive.io that enables users to log time, inspect projects, and manage time entries using natural language commands. It features fuzzy project matching, local caching, and remembers default services per project for streamlined time tracking.14MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets LLMs interact with your Clockify workspace for time-tracking automation and reporting, enabling natural language logging of time entries, querying entries, and generating reports.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for logging time entries locally and synchronizing them with OpenProject, enabling natural language time tracking and upload to OpenProject.1628 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis MCP server enables AI assistants to interact with the Timing application for managing time tracking and tasks, including project and time entry operations.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables to manage Toggl time entries, projects, tasks, and timers through natural language commands.2 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server enabling natural language interaction with Hubstaff data, including organizations, projects, members, tasks, and tracked-time activities.101MIT
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action (e.g., get_current_timer vs. list_time_entries, start_timer vs. create_time_entry). Even with overlapping domains, the descriptions make boundaries clear.
All tools share the 'focus_' prefix and almost all follow a verb_noun pattern (list_projects, create_task, update_time_entry). The few exceptions (whoami, search) are standard single-word commands and don't break the overall consistency.
24 tools is on the higher end but justified by the broad Toggl Focus domain covering projects, tasks, time entries, clients, tags, statuses, and user/context helpers. It feels comprehensive without redundant or trivial tools.
Core resources have strong coverage: projects and tasks support list/get/create/update, and time entries support list/create/update/delete. However, projects and tasks lack delete operations, and clients/tags only support list/create, leaving notable lifecycle gaps for these resources.