list_contacts
Retrieve a complete list of all contacts stored in your SendGrid account.
Instructions
List all contacts in your SendGrid account
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve a complete list of all contacts stored in your SendGrid account.
List all contacts in your SendGrid account
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It fails to mention pagination, rate limits, or whether contacts are returned in bulk. 'List all contacts' is vague without limits or format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no waste, but slightly under-specified given the lack of annotations and output schema. Could include more context without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Without annotations or output schema, the description is the sole source of context. It explains the core function but omits details like pagination, required scopes, or how to handle large result sets. Incomplete for safe invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, and schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter info, which is acceptable as there are none. Baseline score for zero parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (list) and resource (contacts) with scope (all in account). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_contacts_by_list or get_contact_by_id.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_contacts_by_list or get_contacts_by_emails. The agent must infer context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/coopersully/sendgrid-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server