Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to hamgoose

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous software-engineering tasks in a repository by coordinating filesystem, GitHub, database, and CI/CD tools through MCP, with a deterministic safety boundary for permissions, validation, timeouts, duplicate protection, and test verification.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables many coding agents to change one codebase at once by granting function-level clearances before edits, holding conflicting work, landing verified commits one at a time, and recording each change's intent, plan and test evidence as retrievable git notes.
      0
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Orchestrates multiple coding agents at once so an MCP client can delegate implementation work while retaining judgment: each agent runs in its own isolated git worktree and branch, claims the files it edits, and communicates via a mailbox and shared board. Supports blocking questions to the orchestrator, Codex-written acceptance tests locked before workers start, scope validation, and reporting on first-pass success.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools map cleanly to lifecycle stages (create/plan/approve/run/pause/resume/steer/replan/cancel) and read-only views (status/events/readiness/plan_view). A few control-loop actions like mission_run, mission_resume, and mission_steer could be confused, but their descriptions clarify the differences.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the mission_ prefix and use lower_snake_case, but the pattern mixes bare verbs (mission_run, mission_pause), noun-like resources (mission_status, mission_events), and compound verb_noun forms (mission_retry_feature, mission_apply_suggestions). This is readable and predictable, though not as uniform as a strict verb_noun convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 19 tools, the surface is on the heavy side for an MCP server. Most tools are individually justified by mission lifecycle needs, but a few niche helpers like mission_apply_suggestions and mission_gc, plus several status-like queries, could plausibly be consolidated.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset covers the full mission lifecycle: create, plan, approve, run, pause, resume, steer, replan, cancel, plus status/events/readiness/plan_view and manual retry/completion/validation paths. There are no obvious dead ends for the stated purpose, and external-completion and cleanup workflows are included.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues