hamgoose
Related Servers
Alternatives to hamgoose
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to run a machine-verified DESIGN→PLAN→EXECUTE→VERIFY→COMPLETE workflow with human approval gates, state integrity checks, and DAG task scheduling.7-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables autonomous software-engineering tasks in a repository by coordinating filesystem, GitHub, database, and CI/CD tools through MCP, with a deterministic safety boundary for permissions, validation, timeouts, duplicate protection, and test verification.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Codex to plan and get approval, execute tasks with DSH in isolated Git worktrees, independently review results, and optionally deliver draft PRs/MRs.8 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables many coding agents to change one codebase at once by granting function-level clearances before edits, holding conflicting work, landing verified commits one at a time, and recording each change's intent, plan and test evidence as retrievable git notes.0MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceTurns Claude Code into an engineering project manager by orchestrating feature development with isolated Git worktrees, structured task validation, and approval-gated integration.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceOrchestrates multiple coding agents at once so an MCP client can delegate implementation work while retaining judgment: each agent runs in its own isolated git worktree and branch, claims the files it edits, and communicates via a mailbox and shared board. Supports blocking questions to the orchestrator, Codex-written acceptance tests locked before workers start, scope validation, and reporting on first-pass success.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
The tools map cleanly to lifecycle stages (create/plan/approve/run/pause/resume/steer/replan/cancel) and read-only views (status/events/readiness/plan_view). A few control-loop actions like mission_run, mission_resume, and mission_steer could be confused, but their descriptions clarify the differences.
All tools share the mission_ prefix and use lower_snake_case, but the pattern mixes bare verbs (mission_run, mission_pause), noun-like resources (mission_status, mission_events), and compound verb_noun forms (mission_retry_feature, mission_apply_suggestions). This is readable and predictable, though not as uniform as a strict verb_noun convention.
At 19 tools, the surface is on the heavy side for an MCP server. Most tools are individually justified by mission lifecycle needs, but a few niche helpers like mission_apply_suggestions and mission_gc, plus several status-like queries, could plausibly be consolidated.
The toolset covers the full mission lifecycle: create, plan, approve, run, pause, resume, steer, replan, cancel, plus status/events/readiness/plan_view and manual retry/completion/validation paths. There are no obvious dead ends for the stated purpose, and external-completion and cleanup workflows are included.