convergeqa_iterate_decide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must disclose all behaviors. It only says 'submit delegated Iterate decisions' without explaining what happens, side effects, or requirements like auth or session state.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one sentence), but it sacrifices informativeness. It is not front-loaded with key details and does not earn its place given the tool's complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, 8 parameters, and a vague description, the tool definition is incomplete. The agent lacks understanding of what 'submitting delegated Iterate decisions' entails or returns.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 38%, yet the description adds no information about parameters. It does not explain the role of session_id, decisions, action, or others, leaving the agent unsupported.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb 'submit' and resource 'delegated Iterate decisions', but it is too vague and does not distinguish from sibling tools like convergeqa_critique_decide. The context of 'Iterate decisions' is unclear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No information is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives. There are no prerequisites, context, or exclusions mentioned, leaving the agent without guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.