A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to create, control, and interact with virtual desktop environments through E2B's secure cloud sandboxes.
6
12
4
MIT
E2B MCP Server
by contributory
Related Servers
Alternatives to E2B MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with E2b's tools and services through a standardized MCP interface, allowing AI agents to use E2b capabilities.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for E2B code sandbox, enabling creation, management, and execution of code in secure sandboxes using Python and shell commands.41MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceProvides remote filesystem operations, git repository management, and process execution capabilities for AI agents through the Model Context Protocol.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to create, manage, and execute code in isolated Firecracker microVM sandboxes via the MCP protocol, with support for sandbox lifecycle and file operations.3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for secure local system operations, enabling shell command execution and file management via a standardized interface.141Apache 2.0
TDQS
C2.9/5.0
Scored across 23 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools clearly target distinct resources and actions, but a few overlap: refresh_sandbox and set_sandbox_timeout both adjust TTL, and get_template vs get_template_by_alias are similar. Overall, the purposes are still largely separable.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools share the e2b_ prefix and snake_case verb_noun structure, making the set predictable. Minor deviations include list_sandboxes_v2 vs get_sandbox_logs, and make_dir vs create_sandbox, but these do not seriously harm usability.
Tool Count3/5
23 tools is on the heavy side and spans sandboxes, templates, filesystems, and process control. The count is defensible given the breadth, but it starts to feel large for an agent to scan.
Completeness4/5
Sandbox lifecycle, filesystem, and process interaction are well covered. The main gap is template management: only get operations exist, with no create/update/delete template tools, though this may be intentionally outside the server's scope.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessSyncing