Skip to main content
Glama
conorbronsdon

avoid-ai-writing-mcp

by conorbronsdon
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to avoid-ai-writing-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • signs-of-ai

      peopleworks
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Bilingual (EN/ES) AI-writing detection that shows the evidence instead of a percentage: named tells with line and column, hidden-character inspection, and citation cross-checking against a document's own bibliography. Seven of its nine tools run entirely locally and never touch the network.
      10
      23
      MIT

    • geo-tool-check

      geo-tool-com
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides agents with tools to score a page's AI readiness, check which AI crawlers robots.txt blocks, and assess passage citability—all performed locally.
      370
      2
      MIT

    • content-qa-mcp

      Alvi-808
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables editorial content QA over the Model Context Protocol with four local tools that analyze readability, AI-sounding language, SEO on-page factors, and produce full reports where every finding includes an actionable fix.
      4
      1
      MIT

    • AI Text Detection with

      houtini-ai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      ai-detect is a free AI text detector that runs entirely on your own hardware. It scores writing sentence by sentence using desklib/ai-text-detector-v1.01, a 304-million-parameter DeBERTa-v3-large model that ranks first on the RAID detection benchmark. No API key, no per-word pricing and no upload: after a one-off 1.7 GB model download it just works offline. by Houtini
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    score_text and audit_text have clearly separated purposes: one returns a compact classification while the other returns detailed flagged patterns and highlighted regions. The cross-references in the descriptions remove any real ambiguity about which tool to use.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same verb_noun pattern with lowercase snake_case and concise action words. This is fully consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Two tools is slightly below the typical 3-15 range, but for a narrowly scoped local text detector the pair covers both a compact score and a detailed audit. Each tool has a distinct, useful role, so the small count feels intentional rather than inadequate.

    Completeness5/5

    The server's apparent domain is deterministic AI-writing detection on text, and the two tools cover the full user journey: getting a quick judgment or drilling into specific flagged patterns and highlighted regions. There are no obvious missing operations for this stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources