Skip to main content
Glama
conorbronsdon

avoid-ai-writing-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to avoid-ai-writing-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to score prose from 0-100 for formulaic AI writing tells using pure rule-based heuristics, exposing tools to analyze inline text or files on disk and return violation details, band labels, and concrete advice without any LLM judge or network calls.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to analyze inline prose or files on disk for formulaic AI writing patterns, returning a 0-100 score, band label, specific violations with context, and concrete advice. Uses purely programmatic, configurable rules with no LLM judge or API calls.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents and users to analyze text or files for formulaic AI writing patterns and receive a 0–100 score, band label, violations with surrounding context, and concrete advice. It works programmatically without LLM judges or API calls.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Analyzes text and files for formulaic AI writing patterns, returning a 0-100 score, band label, specific violations with context, and concrete revision advice. Runs entirely locally with rule-based heuristics, requiring no LLM judge or API calls.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to score prose from 0–100 for formulaic AI writing patterns using rule-based linting, returning diagnostics such as band labels, violations with context, and advice. It can analyze inline text or files without API calls or LLM judges.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Scores prose from 0 to 100 for formulaic AI writing patterns using purely programmatic rules, with no LLM judge or API calls. Enables agents to lint text or files and receive a score, band label, specific violations with surrounding context, and concrete advice for each hit.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    score_text and audit_text have clearly separated purposes: one returns a compact classification while the other returns detailed flagged patterns and highlighted regions. The cross-references in the descriptions remove any real ambiguity about which tool to use.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same verb_noun pattern with lowercase snake_case and concise action words. This is fully consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Two tools is slightly below the typical 3-15 range, but for a narrowly scoped local text detector the pair covers both a compact score and a detailed audit. Each tool has a distinct, useful role, so the small count feels intentional rather than inadequate.

    Completeness5/5

    The server's apparent domain is deterministic AI-writing detection on text, and the two tools cover the full user journey: getting a quick judgment or drilling into specific flagged patterns and highlighted regions. There are no obvious missing operations for this stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues