Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
airealty-lawmcp

airealty-lawmcp

by conoc612-a11y
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to airealty-lawmcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Korean Law MCP Server

      woongaro
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving Korean statutes, precedents, and constitutional court decisions via MCP, using the National Law Information Center API.
      7,934 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Korean Law MCP

      daeryundf2-prog
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and terminals to retrieve and cross-reference Korean legal sources through 10 tools built on 42 Ministry of Government Legislation APIs, covering statutes, precedents, administrative rules, ordinances, treaties, and interpretations. Adds hallucination-resistant citation verification, article impact graphs, point-in-time diffing of in-force versions, case citator checks, and applicable-law-at-the-time analysis.
      10
      7,934 npm
      MIT

    • 갈피 법령조회 MCP

      uscaidev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and retrieve Korean laws, regulations, administrative rules, legal interpretations, and precedents via official APIs for legal review workflows.
      1
      MIT

    • kr-law

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Lets AI agents query South Korea's official statute database — searching laws and ordinances by title, pulling a single article (조문) with its own effective date, or tracing a statute's full revision history — using the caller's own Open API key. Text is returned in Korean only, with support for branch numbering like 제4조의2 and automatic retries against unstable upstream responses.
      270 npm
      MIT

    • korean-law-mcp

      joohyukjung
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables natural language search and retrieval of Korean laws, precedents, administrative rules, and legal terms, with deep legal chain analysis and full-text access. Supports stdio and streamable-http transports for local and remote deployment.
      10
      MIT

    • Korean Law MCP Server

      yunhyok
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to search and retrieve official legal documents from the Ministry of Government Legislation's Open API — current and historical statutes, administrative rules, local ordinances, court precedents, constitutional decisions, and legal interpretations — including article-level text lookup. Runs locally over stdio with paginated retrieval of long responses and no external database or web UI required.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools mostly target distinct resources and actions: source search vs. source retrieval, statute finding vs. article retrieval vs. outline/history/annex, citation auditing vs. precedent tracing, and contract risk scanning. The main mild overlap is that research_run and toolbox act as orchestration/catalog layers that conceptually touch specialized tools, but their descriptions still make roles clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use lowercase snake_case, and most follow a readable noun_verb pattern such as source_search, statute_find, article_get, annex_get, source_get, citation_audit, and precedent_trace. Exceptions such as statute_history, statute_outline, contract_risk_scan, and toolbox are still clear, so this is a minor deviation rather than inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range for a legal research server and each tool covers a distinct facet: search, retrieval, statute structure, amendment history, annexes, citation audit, precedent tracing, contract scanning, and orchestration. No tool appears redundant or excessive for the stated scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface broadly covers the legal research lifecycle: statute discovery, article retrieval, annexes, amendment history, source search/retrieval, citation auditing, precedent tracing, contract risk scanning, and auxiliary features via toolbox. Minor gaps such as direct legal-term definitions or amendment alerts are relegated to toolbox rather than first-class tools, but core workflows have no dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources