Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to bite

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Checks what local coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex and Cursor really did: files changed, commands run and test results read from test output, not the agent's word. Unclear test results can be double-checked by Laya (on your computer) or TypeSafe's Jev (cloud, your own API key). Read-only.
      10
      28 npm
      60
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to run deterministic completeness audits on code before declaring 'done'—catching unwired modules, placebo tests, swallowed errors, and stubs via AST analysis, entirely offline and free.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to make AI coding agents prove their work with passing tests before finishing, snapshot every edit so any step can be undone, and trim noisy tool output to save tokens. Runs locally with no telemetry and works with Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode.
      66 PyPI
      4
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to scan a repository for code that cannot prove its usefulness, attribute it to AI-assisted or human commits, prove candidate deletions against the project's own tests, and pull a payoff report or run history, all without ever writing to the repository. The test command and any model judging stay under a person's control through environment configuration.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are cleanly separated by target: check_fix operates on the code change the agent just made, while ask_bite queries already-committed fixes described in plain language. Each description explicitly states its trigger condition ('after you change code' vs 'about a fix already committed'), leaving no realistic selection ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both names are snake_case verb_object constructions (check_fix, ask_bite), which is consistent. Minor deviation: ask_bite embeds the server name as its object, so the second token is not a domain entity like the first.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin for a general-purpose server, though bite's scope is genuinely narrow (revert-and-test verification). Each tool earns its place, but the surface offers no room for adjacent operations such as listing matchable commits.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: verify a new fix has a failing-without/passing-with test, and interrogate history for whether an old fix is guarded. The only rough edge is the dead end when ask_bite finds no commit match, requiring the agent to rephrase with commit message words rather than browse candidates.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessSyncing