update-tag
Update a tag's name or color to organize feature flags.
Instructions
This endpoint updates a Tag identified by the tagId parameter.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tagId | Yes | ||
| requestBody | Yes |
Update a tag's name or color to organize feature flags.
This endpoint updates a Tag identified by the tagId parameter.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tagId | Yes | ||
| requestBody | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as idempotency, partial update support, or side effects. The description merely states the action without additional context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that efficiently communicates the purpose. It is well-structured and front-loaded with the verb and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description should provide more context such as return value, error conditions, or partial update behavior. The current minimal description is insufficient.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has low coverage (tagId lacks description, requestBody lacks top-level description). The description does not add meaning beyond the schema; it only mentions the tagId parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'updates' and the resource 'Tag', and uniquely identifies it via the 'tagId' parameter. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'create-tag' and 'delete-tag'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/configcat/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server