mcp-email-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-email-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables receiving and sending email via IMAP and SMTP across multiple accounts, with tools for listing, searching, reading, replying, and managing messages.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables remote reading, searching, and management of an IMAP inbox and sending plain-text email through SMTP using your own mailbox credentials.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables email management via IMAP/SMTP, supporting list emails, read emails, send emails, and save drafts.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables reading and drafting emails via IMAP, including searching and managing drafts, through natural language.1,526 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables email management for a single mailbox via IMAP and SMTP protocols. Supports reading, searching, and sending emails with threading support through stdio or HTTP transports.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with email accounts via IMAP and SMTP, supporting mailbox listing, email search, retrieval, sending, and management.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool maps cleanly to a distinct action in the email workflow: read, search, wait, send, draft, mark, move, delete, download, list folders, and check connection. Even similar operations like move_email and delete_email are clearly separated by delete targeting Trash.
All tools use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: read_email, list_folders, send_email, save_draft, etc. Multi-word verbs like wait_for_new_emails follow the same clear convention without mixing styles.
The 11 tools are well-scoped for an email server covering sending, receiving, searching, drafts, attachments, folders, and account health. Each tool has a clear purpose and none feel redundant.
Core email workflows are well covered: read, search, send, draft, move, delete, mark, and attachment download. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit attachment support when sending and no folder creation or management, but these are not critical dead ends.