Skip to main content
Glama
concavegit

App Store Connect MCP Server

by concavegit

disable_bundle_capability

Remove a capability from a bundle ID in App Store Connect to manage app features and permissions.

Instructions

Disable a capability for a bundle ID

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
capabilityIdYesThe ID of the capability to disable

Implementation Reference

  • The handler function that executes the disable_bundle_capability tool. It validates the capabilityId argument and calls the AppStoreConnectClient to DELETE /bundleIdCapabilities/{capabilityId}, then returns a success message.
    async disableBundleCapability(args: {
      capabilityId: string;
    }): Promise<{ success: boolean; message: string }> {
      const { capabilityId } = args;
      
      validateRequired(args, ['capabilityId']);
    
      await this.client.delete(`/bundleIdCapabilities/${capabilityId}`);
    
      return { 
        success: true, 
        message: "Capability disabled successfully" 
      };
    }

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and description only states the action without disclosing side effects, idempotency, authorization needs, or reversibility. For a mutation tool, this is minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no fluff, front-loaded with action and resource. Efficient and direct.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks explanation of how capabilityId relates to bundle ID despite description mentioning bundle. Missing output schema details and context about capability scope. Incomplete for a simple toggle tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameters with clear description. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, achieving baseline adequacy.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses specific verb 'disable' and resource 'capability for a bundle ID', clearly identifying the action. It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'enable_bundle_capability'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Does not mention prerequisites, context, or conditions. Sibling presence implies opposite but description provides no explicit usage advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.