Skip to main content
Glama
competlab

competlab-mcp-server

by competlab

Related Servers

Alternatives to competlab-mcp-server

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    SEO and marketing intelligence toolkit for keyword research, SERP analysis, backlink checking, content optimization, technical site audits, and content brief generation. 6 tools to improve search engine rankings.
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables brand visibility monitoring across major AI platforms like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. It allows users to track visibility scores, analyze competitor data, and receive actionable insights to improve AI-generated brand recommendations.
    16
    4 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Competitive intelligence MCP server for sales teams. Get battle cards, objection handlers, pricing comparisons, pre-call briefings, and AI sales simulations for any company vs any competitor. 11 tools with a free tier.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Track how your brand appears in AI-generated answers across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and other AI models. Analyze visibility, sentiment, citations, and domain rankings with 31 tools — including analytics reports, chat inspection, query analysis, and full CRUD for brands, prompts, tags, and topics.
    17
    39 npm
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    AI search intelligence + Ahrefs-class SEO suite as 59 MCP tools. Track your brand across ChatGPT, Google AI Overview, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity with persona-anchored Brand Radar dispatches.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants such as Claude, Cursor, and Codex to pull structured, source-backed, dated competitive intelligence — positioning, pricing, ads, social, reviews, hiring, momentum, and exploitable weaknesses — for any company in the universe, alongside the user's own projects, reports, battlecards, timelines, and evidence. Read-only by default, with optional opt-in competitor creation and plan-gated tools for deeper analysis.
    13
    474 npm
    MIT

TDQS

A4/5.0

Scored across 48 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource+action, and the set cleanly separates monitored dimensions (get_tech_trust_dashboard) from live one-off scans (start_trust_signals_scan, check_sitemap) and from briefing/ticketing. The main friction is the parallel naming of near-identical access patterns (get_content_run_detail vs get_ai_visibility_check_detail) and the cluster of three similar-sounding scans, which descriptions laboriously disambiguate but a rushed agent could still mix up.

Naming Consistency5/5

Consistent snake_case verb_noun throughout: list_*, get_*, start_*, create_*, update_*, move_*, delete_*, add_*, check_*, fetch_*. The dimension families follow a perfectly predictable template (<dimension>_dashboard / _history / _run_detail), and even the runId-vs-checkId distinction is reflected deliberately in the '_check_detail' suffix.

Tool Count3/5

48 tools is heavy and well past the comfortable range, even for a platform with six monitoring dimensions, a briefing subsystem, and a full ticketing board. Almost every tool has a real, non-duplicative role, so nothing is obviously padding, but the surface is large enough that discovery and selection cost is significant.

Completeness4/5

Coverage is broad: per-dimension dashboards, paginated histories and run details, live scans, alerts, briefings, and full ticket lifecycle including comments, labels and assignees. Gaps are minor and partly deliberate — schedules can be listed but not modified, labels cannot be created, and competitors/projects are read-only — leaving a few dead ends an agent must work around.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues