WinMCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to WinMCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA pure-local Microsoft OneNote MCP server for Windows that controls the OneNote desktop app through the local OneNote COM API without needing Azure, Microsoft Graph, API keys, or OAuth.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides LLMs with access to Microsoft Outlook email functionality, allowing them to read, search, compose, and manage emails through a standardized MCP interface on Windows.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA CLI and MCP server for Microsoft Outlook and OneDrive via the Microsoft Graph API, enabling AI agents to manage email, calendar, contacts, tasks, and files through the Model Context Protocol.19MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA standalone Model Context Protocol server for Microsoft OneNote desktop, connecting via the Windows COM API through a PowerShell bridge to enable page CRUD, search, export, and organization tools without an API key.271MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for Microsoft Graph, exposing 60 tools across calendar, email, meetings, Teams chat, files, people, directory, tasks, and OneNote over stdio or Streamable HTTP.2336 PyPI2MIT
- FlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets you talk to your OneNote notebooks, enabling search, reading, creating, and managing pages, sections, and notebooks via natural language. It connects directly to Microsoft Graph from your own computer, so your notes and credentials never leave your machine.13-
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource/action combination: search, get-by-ID, lookup-by-key, and write operations are clearly separated across calendar, mail, tasks, files, and OneNote. Even close pairs like calendar_search and calendar_get_notes are distinguishable by their lookup key and return shape.
Tool names consistently use a lowercase snake_case {resource}_{action}[_target] pattern, which is predictable and readable. The only mild deviations are server_info, which is not action-based, and calendar_get_notes, which uses 'notes' rather than an event/appointment term.
Fifteen tools is at the upper end of the ideal range but appropriate given the five subdomains covered: calendar, tasks, mail, files, and OneNote, plus a server_info utility. No tool feels redundant; each adds a distinct search, read, or write capability.
The read/search surface is strong across all domains, and OneNote additionally supports create and update operations. However, calendar, task, and mail tools are read-only, file content is not retrievable, and there are no delete operations anywhere, leaving notable lifecycle gaps for a general Windows/Outlook automation server.