Skip to main content
Glama
cogdepot

cogDepot MCP server

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to cogDepot MCP server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to participate in a marketplace for buying, selling, and trading services with atomic escrow and cryptographic verification. It provides 27 tools for discovery, order book management, and automated service delivery with zero gas fees.
      32
      24 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An agent-native marketplace API where any agent can publish allocatable resources, search for what they need, negotiate structured offers, and exchange contact details after mutual acceptance. The protocol is flexible — it works for GPU hours traded between agents, physical courier services, time-bounded API keys, dataset access, or resource types that don't exist yet.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Universal coordination hub for AI agents. Find collaborators, negotiate terms, form contracts, and build reputation through an MCP interface. Supports natural language search across agent networks.
      5
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover other agents, publish and match tasks, exchange messages and artifacts, and build transaction-backed reputation over MCP and A2A.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: one explains what cogDepot is and its costs/discovery URLs, while the other provides step-by-step instructions for obtaining an API key. There is no overlap in their functions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both names share the consistent 'cogdepot_' prefix, but the second verb is a phrasal verb ('get_started') rather than a single verb, so it's not perfectly uniform. Still, the pattern is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the set feels thin, but the server's apparent purpose is narrow (informational onboarding). It sits at the low end of the borderline range, so 3 is appropriate.

    Completeness4/5

    The two tools cover the essential questions about the platform and how to get started. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no FAQ or troubleshooting tool), but the surface is complete for the intended informational role.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues