Skip to main content
Glama
coffeecoproject

LayerMap

by coffeecoproject
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to LayerMap

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • codebase-rag

      Ar-maan05
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to efficiently understand and navigate a codebase by providing semantic search over symbols and a reference graph, replacing expensive grep/glob calls with structured tools like definition lookup, caller/callee queries, and change-impact analysis.
      3
      MIT
    • spine by SylphxAI

      spineofficial

      SylphxAI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides local-first repository architecture analysis with file-level proof, enabling agents to map codebases, locate implementations, trace call paths, and assess change impact with deterministic evidence.
      4 npm
      2
      MIT

    • CodeGraph MCP Server

      NabiaTech
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying and analyzing code relationships by building a lightweight graph of TypeScript and Python symbols. Supports symbol lookup, reference tracking, impact analysis from diffs, and code snippet retrieval through natural language.
      -

    • PrecisionContextEngine

      Bluezeamer
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to efficiently navigate and understand large codebases by providing tools for entry point location, call chain analysis, and impact assessment, reducing context consumption and model costs.
      5
      3
      GPL 3.0

    • ripple

      xtelos
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides coding agents with a Python repository's call graph and impact analysis, enabling them to see callers, callees, and affected tests before making changes.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Three tools map to distinct phases—locate declarations (search), map structure/callers (explore), and enumerate all usages (find_references)—but explore_map is a broad multi-modal tool whose cached caller tracing overlaps with find_references. Descriptions explicitly differentiate cached vs. computed references and search vs. exploration, so confusion is limited.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All names use snake_case with a consistent project_ prefix and a clear verb_noun structure (explore_map, search_map, find_references). There are no mixed conventions or vague names.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is compact yet covers the core navigation operations of search, exploration, and reference lookup. The count is on the low end because explore_map is overloaded, but it is not too thin for the purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers declaration search, structural/call exploration, and reference enumeration, with no major lifecycle gaps for a static code map. Direct source retrieval and exact full-text search are intentionally out of scope and left to external tools, which agents can work around.

    Resources