A
licenseA
qualityF
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides AI agents with secure access to local filesystem operations, enabling reading, writing, and managing files through a standardized interface.
10
48 npm
51
Apache 2.0
MCP File Server
by codyde
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP File Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to securely read, search, and analyze local file systems through the Model Context Protocol. Provides tools for listing files, pattern-based searching, and reading file contents with built-in security validation.6-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that allows AI models to safely access and interact with local file systems, enabling reading file contents, listing directories, and retrieving file metadata.2 npm10MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI models to securely read, write, and query metadata of local files through a controlled file system interface, with support for local and Azure deployment.-
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to execute terminal commands and Python scripts, search and manage files, and create or delete folders through the Model Context Protocol.9-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to securely browse, search, inspect, and understand local project files through Model Context Protocol tools.MIT
TDQS
D1.8/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The three tools have clearly distinct purposes: createfile for creating files, listfiles for listing files, and readfile for reading files. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these operations, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool for each task.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (createfile, listfiles, readfile) with no deviations. The naming is uniform and predictable, using lowercase letters and clear action-object combinations throughout.
Tool Count3/5
With only three tools, the server feels thin for a file management domain, as it lacks essential operations like update, delete, or write to files. While the count is minimal, it covers basic CRUD aspects but leaves notable gaps in functionality.
Completeness2/5
The tool set is significantly incomplete for file management, missing critical operations such as updatefile, deletefile, and writefile. This creates dead ends for agents trying to perform common file workflows, leading to potential failures in tasks requiring modification or deletion.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues