startup_status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide strong read-only and idempotent hints. The description adds the return format details (JSON keys: ok, installed, details, task_name) beyond what annotations state, offering transparency about the output structure. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, consisting of two clear sentences with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded with the main purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with no parameters and no output schema shown but description covers the return structure. Given the context and sibling tools, the description is complete enough for an agent to understand and use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With zero parameters, baseline is 4. The description does not need to explain parameter meanings as there are none.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool reports the status of a boot-startup scheduled task, specifying both the verb ('Report') and the resource ('boot-startup scheduled task'). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like install_startup and uninstall_startup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for checking status before installation/uninstallation but does not explicitly state when to use it or provide alternatives. There is no mention of when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.