Mutual-Funds-Groww-MCP
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| COOKIE | Yes | The cookie header value from Groww API | |
| AUTHORIZATION_TOKEN | Yes | The authorization header value from Groww API, e.g., 'Bearer eyJ...' |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| search_mutual_fundsA | Search and filter mutual funds in real-time using Groww's live API endpoint. |
| fetch_mutual_fund_detailsA | Fetch in-depth details of a specific mutual fund scheme using its search_id. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one for searching/filtering funds and the other for fetching details of a specific fund. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their intended use.
Both tool names follow the consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (search_mutual_funds, fetch_mutual_fund_details). The minor pluralization difference is not enough to break the overall consistent style.
With only two tools, the server feels quite thin for a mutual funds domain. While the two tools are essential, the low count suggests a limited scope that may not cover broader investor needs.
Search and details cover the core discovery and lookup workflow for mutual funds. However, there are minor gaps such as no explicit tool for historical performance or fund comparison, though these could potentially be accessed through search and details.