create_dynamic_page_row

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states that the tool creates a row, but does not disclose authentication requirements, side effects, idempotency, or any other behavioral traits beyond 'create'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one sentence and front-loaded, with no wasteful wording. However, it is under-specified for a complex create operation, so it is not appropriately sized for the tool's needs.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the moderate complexity (4 params, nested object) and lack of annotations and output schema, this description is severely incomplete. It provides almost no contextual information about what a DynamicPageRow is, how row_data should be structured, or what the response will be.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 25%, and the description adds no information about token, cookie, api_url, or row_data. It does not compensate for the largely undocumented parameters, leaving the agent without semantic guidance for invoking the tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Creates a DynamicPageRow in Plone' clearly states the verb and resource. It distinguishes the action but does not differentiate from the sibling tool create_dynamic_page_row_featured, so it lacks explicit differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_dynamic_page_row_featured, nor any context about prerequisites or intended scenarios. The description provides no usage direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.