Skip to main content
Glama
coderexpert123

Task Orchestration

by coderexpert123
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to Task Orchestration

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • moo-tasks

      shekarsiri
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for agentic task orchestration and management, enabling AI agents to create goals, plan tasks with acceptance criteria, track dependencies, request human input, and provide proof of completion.
      24 npm
      2
      MIT

    • TaskFlow MCP

      AdarshVijay101
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server for task management, enabling LLMs to create, list, and manage tasks via tools and resources, with support for local stdio and cloud Streamable HTTP deployment.
      5
      -

    • Google Tasks MCP Server

      omshejul
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that enables LLMs to manage Google Tasks and task lists through workflow-oriented tools for creation, updating, searching, and organizing tasks.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: add_tasks for batch creation, complete_task_status for updating status, create_goal for goal creation, get_tasks for retrieval, and remove_tasks for soft deletion. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., add_tasks, complete_task_status, create_goal, get_tasks, remove_tasks). The naming is uniform and predictable, with no deviations in style or convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for task orchestration, covering core operations like creation, retrieval, update, and deletion. Each tool serves a necessary function without redundancy, fitting typical server sizes of 3-15 tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides strong coverage for task management, including CRUD-like operations (create, get, update status, soft delete) and goal creation. A minor gap exists in updating goal details or hard-deleting tasks, but agents can work around this with the available tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources