Skip to main content
Glama
procm-mcp

procm-mcp

by coder-ka

Related Servers

Alternatives to procm-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure MCP server for executing whitelisted shell commands with resource and timeout controls, designed for integration with Claude and other MCP-compatible LLMs.
      20
      389 npm
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A secure MCP server for shell operations, terminal management, and process control, enabling AI assistants to safely execute commands and manage interactive sessions.
      13
      134 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely create, manage, and monitor local processes such as dev servers, docker-compose, and test watchers, including restarting, checking status, and retrieving logs via MCP, HTTP, or WebSocket messaging.
      288 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A lightweight, cross-platform MCP server for managing background processes. Enables AI coding agents to spawn, monitor, and interact with long-lived processes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing interactive processes, enabling AI agents to start, interact with, and terminate long-running programs like SSH sessions, REPLs, and installers via read/write operations.
      8
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action or resource: starting, allowing, deleting, listing, retrieving info, stdout, stderr. No two tools have overlapping purposes; descriptions clearly differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb-noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., start-process, get-process-info). Naming is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the server covers process lifecycle management comprehensively without redundancy. The count feels appropriate for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    Core operations (start, list, info, restart, delete, output retrieval) are covered. Missing tools like graceful stop or sending input, but the set is sufficient for basic management.