A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceEnables evaluation of AI-generated code across 45 specialized dimensions using deterministic pattern matching and optional LLM-powered deep review, acting as an independent quality gate.
31
608 npm
7
MIT
CodeGuardian MCP
by codegoddy
Related Servers
Alternatives to CodeGuardian MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding tools to query your live codebase for routes, import graph, domain context, and blast radius, eliminating hallucinations about project structure.377 npm76MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA verification layer that lets AI agents safely delete code in large codebases by assessing usage paths and providing risk statuses.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceStatic analysis for vibe-coded apps. Flags security, reliability, performance, and AI quality issues in code generated by Cursor, v0, Bolt, and Copilot.575 npm15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to run fast, sandboxed pre-flight validation—tests, type-checking, linting, security audits, Git safety scans, and fix suggestions—before committing or pushing code, with instant caching and optional Docker isolation.107 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to verify code against YAML specifications, detecting missing fields, extra fields, and type mismatches to prevent silent drift before commits.3MIT
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 12 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clear, distinct purposes, especially the lifecycle pairs for guardians and validation jobs. The main confusion risk is between validate_code and start_validation, which are distinguished primarily by codebase size, and validate_api_contracts vs get_api_contract_report, which could be seen as overlapping.
Naming Consistency5/5
Tool names consistently follow a verb_noun pattern with get_, start_, stop_, and validate_ prefixes. There are no mixed casing or naming style violations, making the tool surface predictable.
Tool Count5/5
Twelve tools is well within the sweet spot for a domain with multiple sub-areas: code validation, guardian lifecycle, alert retrieval, dependency analysis, and API contract checking. Each tool contributes a distinct capability without bloating the surface.
Completeness4/5
The set covers the main validation workflow (start/status/results), guardian lifecycle (start/stop/status/alerts), and API contract validation/reporting. A notable gap is the absence of a cancel or stop operation for background validation jobs, since stop_guardian only applies to Guardians.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues