F
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceAn MCP server with HTTP/stdio support, a web admin panel for managing services, capabilities, and user permissions with Bearer token authentication, enabling relay and access control for MCP tools.
-
ucontrol-mcp
by codefitz
Related Servers
Alternatives to ucontrol-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceUnified MCP server for ArcGIS Online and Enterprise providing tools for user/group management, item management, geoprocessing, feature layer queries/editing, and server administration.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA universal MCP server for registering internal, external, and OpenAPI-based APIs as MCP tools. It exposes them to MCP clients via Streamable HTTP and provides admin portal, RBAC/session auth, credential injection, and audit logging.Academic Free v1.1
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing tools for spatial grid applications including calculations, MongoDB management, asset management, project creation, and experience publishing.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for unified SQL database access, supporting multiple databases with schema discovery, caching, and safety controls.10 npmMIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables deployment and management of MCP servers through a simple configuration-based interface.1-
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 24 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools target distinct resources (protocols, schemas, assets, uMap sub-entities), but some overlap exists between model-related reads (e.g., read_umap_model_details vs. read_umap_models) which could cause misselection. The consistent prefix helps, but the volume of similar read tools creates mild ambiguity.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with the prefix 'ucontrol_read_', making the naming highly predictable and uniform. There are no mixed conventions or arbitrary verb choices.
Tool Count4/5
With 24 tools, the server is on the heavy side but justifiable given the multiple sub-APIs it exposes (protocols, schemas, assets, uMap). The count is within a manageable range for the scope, though it approaches the upper limit.
Completeness2/5
The server is entirely read-only; there are no create, update, or delete tools, which is a significant gap for a 'control' server. The description hints at write protocols but none are implemented, leaving the surface severely incomplete for any management or mutation workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues