create_alert

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, permissions required, or that the alert is created but not activated. The bare description lacks necessary transparency for a creation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a single sentence and a JSON example. While the example is lengthy, it serves as a clear illustration. No wasted words, but the structure could be improved by separating the example from the main description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The input schema is complex with many nested fields, yet the description only covers a few. There is no output schema, and the description does not indicate what the tool returns (e.g., created alert ID). The description is incomplete for an agent to use reliably.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must compensate. The example shows usage of accountId, alertName, and conditions but omits explanation of many other fields like orderId, alertMessage, etc. It partially helps but leaves significant gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new trading alert' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from siblings like get_alerts, delete_alert, activate_alert by focusing on creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a concrete usage example with JSON, helping the agent understand the structure. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like activate_alert or how to handle prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.