No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 14 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes (init, propose, proposal_decide, waivers, impact, explain), but the verification cluster—verify, check, and audit—overlaps significantly, with descriptions distinguishing them only subtly (build gate vs architecture rules vs full audit). Similarly, next_action, review, and analyze all produce or refresh bounded agent-facing context, creating some boundary confusion.
All 14 tools share a uniform lowercase snake_case `codapult_guard_` prefix, which is highly predictable. Slight inconsistency arises from mixing bare verbs (init, verify, propose, audit, check, review, explain, analyze) with noun forms (context, governance, waivers, impact, next_action, proposal_decide), but the pattern remains readable.
14 tools sits comfortably in the well-scoped 3-15 range and maps to discernible workflow stages (discover, init, propose, decide, verify, audit, review, manage waivers). No tool appears redundant enough to trim, and none of the surface feels padded.
The lifecycle is largely covered: discovery (context), initialization (init), rule proposal and approval (propose/proposal_decide), enforcement (verify/check/audit), review (review), exceptions (waivers), and introspection (impact, explain, governance, analyze). Minor gaps exist—no explicit reset/teardown of Guard artifacts and waiver management is a single bundled tool rather than discrete list/create/remove operations.