Skip to main content
Glama
coco4atJP

RuvLTRA MCP Server

by coco4atJP
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to RuvLTRA MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Hermes Squad

      BarnsL
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Multi-agent AI orchestrator that runs parallel coding agents in isolated sessions with self-improving intelligence, exposed via an MCP server for task execution and management.
      MIT

    • @h0wzy/mcp

      H0wZy
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables multi-agent AI collaboration by connecting Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, and Google Antigravity, providing cross-model code reviews, independent second opinions, and autonomous validation through MCP tools.
      1
      -

    • pi-mcp

      lucasjingcn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Orchestrates multiple coding agents at once so an MCP client can delegate implementation work while retaining judgment: each agent runs in its own isolated git worktree and branch, claims the files it edits, and communicates via a mailbox and shared board. Supports blocking questions to the orchestrator, Codex-written acceptance tests locked before workers start, scope validation, and reporting on first-pass success.
      Apache 2.0

    • squad-mcp

      MustafaBozann
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A cost-optimized MCP server that orchestrates parallel specialist agents to review code changes, write tests, update docs, and suggest refactors, using a triage step to avoid unnecessary work.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct actions, but ruvltra_code_generate vs ruvltra_parallel_generate and ruvltra_code_review vs ruvltra_swarm_review could cause misselection if the single vs. parallel distinction is missed. Overall, the remaining boundaries are clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the ruvltra_ prefix and snake_case, and the code_* family follows a consistent pattern. Minor deviations exist with ruvltra_status and ruvltra_sona_stats being noun-like, and parallel_generate/swarm_review not following the code_* pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well within the ideal range and each tool has a distinct purpose in the code generation, review, and worker management lifecycle. The parallel and swarm variants are justified by the server's concurrency-oriented design.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full code workflow: generate, review, refactor, explain, test, fix, complete, and translate, plus parallel variants. Operational coverage is also solid with status, stats, and worker scaling, leaving no obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources