AI OS MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to AI OS MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes a Markdown-based second brain as MCP tools, enabling MCP clients like Claude Code, Codex, Claude Desktop, n8n, and bots to read context, search notes, retrieve wiki pages, and optionally register decisions or sources.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server that exposes your local Notion backups to AI agents — query databases, read pages, search a backed-up workspace. Offline by default: no LLM calls, no telemetry, no cloud.61MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for querying a running Obsidian vault from agentic runtimes, exposing safe Obsidian CLI commands.551MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceStateless MCP server exposing the full Notion API as 33 tools, enabling users to manage pages, databases, blocks, comments, users, and file uploads using their own integration token.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA lightweight, read-only MCP server for Notion that enables searching, reading pages, and querying databases with token-efficient output and smart caching.18 npm5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceRead-only MCP bridge that exposes secure search and fetch tools over an Obsidian-compatible Markdown vault, enabling ChatGPT to query notes without write access.1Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
search_vault and get_page are clearly separated by search-results vs full-content, and list_projects vs get_project_status are also distinct in scope. The only minor ambiguity is that get_page could also be used to fetch project content that contains status, making the boundary slightly less obvious.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: search_vault, get_page, list_projects, get_project_status. Verbs are lowercase and the naming style is uniform.
With only 4 tools, the server is compact and well-scoped for searching and viewing pages and project statuses. Each tool serves a distinct retrieval purpose and none feels like filler.
The read/search surface is well covered: search, get page, list projects, and get specific status all work together without dead ends. The main gap is the lack of write or update operations, so if modifying pages or project statuses is expected, the toolset would be incomplete.