Generar un evento de webhook firmado

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Aligns with annotations (readOnlyHint=true, openWorldHint=false) and adds context about generating a signed event for testing, including expected behavior of the handler.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Every sentence adds value: purpose first, then usage instructions, then testing advice. No superfluous text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema, the description fully explains what the tool returns (event and header) and covers all necessary usage context for a testing tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not significantly elaborate on parameters beyond the schema, but the overall use case is clear.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns an event identical to real Hilo webhooks with a valid X-Hilo-Signature header, distinguishing it from sibling tools like hilo_verify_webhook_signature and hilo_check_webhook_endpoint.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly describes when to use (testing handler without exposing endpoint), how to use (send body and header to server), and provides testing edge case (altered signature should return 401).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.