Skip to main content
Glama

ledgerline

The trust ledger for AI data agents.

AI agents are writing to your data catalog right now: descriptions, tags, lineage notes, incident diagnoses. Ledgerline answers the question nobody else is asking: which of them can you actually trust?

Every action an agent takes against DataHub is recorded as a claim with a confidence score. When ground truth arrives (an assertion fires, an incident resolves, a steward accepts or reverts a change), the claim is settled. Settled claims accumulate into a per-agent calibration ledger: Brier scores, calibration curves, and a statistical verdict on whether an agent's track record is skill or luck.

The ledger is written back into DataHub itself, so the next agent inherits not just the metadata but the reliability of whoever wrote it.

The part that does not need your agents

Most of this scores agents Ledgerline runs. The reconstruction engine does not.

It reads DataHub's own Timeline API, pulls the metadata changes that already happened in a live catalog, and turns each one into a settleable claim grouped by who wrote it. DataHub's own AI documentation, a third-party agent, a human steward: anything that has ever written to the catalog gets scored on its real record, with no instrumentation and nothing installed in its path.

A write that a later actor blanks or overwrites settles wrong. A write still standing after a survival window settles right, but cheaply. See TECHNICAL.md for why survival is deliberately weak evidence.

Related MCP server: Agent Identity MCP Server

Components

Component

What it does

Worker agents

Thirteen scaffolded agents doing real catalog work through the DataHub MCP server

Settlement engine

Matches claims to observed outcomes and scores every agent

Skill engine

Monte Carlo null, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR control, shrunk trust scores

Trust gateway

An MCP proxy in front of DataHub that stamps context with its author's settled trust. One URL swap for any MCP client

Reconstruction engine

Scores writers a catalog already has, from its change history

Writeback

Provenance tags, structured properties and per-agent dossiers, back into DataHub

Scoreboard

Live leaderboard with calibration curves and per-claim drill-down

The agents

Three do forecasting, four do enrichment and governance proposals, three are meta agents whose subject matter is the agent economy itself, and one is a deliberately weak baseline.

Agent

Claim

Settles on

blastradius

Which downstream assets a dropped column actually breaks

Assertion results

sentinel

Whether a feed will miss its next SLA

The SLA window closing

triage

The root cause of an incident

Incident resolution

enricher

A description for an undocumented column

Steward review

tabledesc

A dataset-level description

Steward review

piitagger

Which columns hold personal data, typed

Steward review

termmapper

Which glossary term a column means

Steward review

ownerrec

The owning team for a dataset

Review

domainassign

The business domain a dataset belongs to

Review

arbiter

When two agents conflict, which proposal holds

The chosen target settling

revertpredictor

Which incoming writes a steward will revert

The target claim settling

auditor

Which datasets were edited around the gateway

A provenance sweep

naive

Pattern-matched filler, always confident

Steward review

naive is not a joke entry. The luck baseline for a proposal is the pooled acceptance rate across agents, so a pool of only excellent proposers means nobody can be distinguished from the pool they define. A realistic weak rival restores contrast, and it is also the market's actual null hypothesis: regex taggers and naming-convention scripts are what teams use today.

Quickstart

You need a running DataHub with the MCP server, Python 3.11+, and any OpenAI-compatible model endpoint. The default stack is an open-weight Qwen3 32B; no proprietary model is required. Full prerequisites and the environment table are in examples/README.md.

bash examples/run_all.sh

That seeds a 12-dataset warehouse graph into DataHub, turns four agents loose on it, settles their claims against ground truth, writes the earned trust back into the catalog, and proves the gateway rejects the agent that earned distrust while reads keep working. It ends with ALL STAGES PASSED or a nonzero exit. Each stage is also a script you can run on its own; the walkthrough covers them one at a time, including what to open in the DataHub UI afterward.

To put the gateway in front of your own agent, point its MCP client at ledgerline instead of the raw server:

LEDGERLINE_AGENT_ID=my-agent \
LEDGERLINE_POLICY=enforce \
LEDGERLINE_MIN_TRUST=55 \
python -m ledgerline.gateway

The agent keeps the identical tool surface. It now also accumulates a settled record and inherits the trust of whoever authored the metadata it reads.

Scoreboard

The public board reads three read-only projections of the ledger under row level security: the leaderboard, calibration curves per agent, and every individual claim. Schema in scoreboard/supabase/schema.sql; scripts/publish_scoreboard.py produces the rows.

Live at ledgerline-scoreboard.vercel.app.

Layout

ledgerline/          the package
  gateway.py           the MCP trust gateway
  claims.py            the claim ledger; settle.py settles against ground truth
  skill.py             skill-vs-luck decomposition and trust scores
  metasettle.py        claims about other claims, settled off the ledger
  provenance.py        read a catalog's own change history (Timeline API)
  reconstruct.py       turn that history into settled claims per writer
  writeback.py         projects trust and dossiers back into DataHub
  publish.py           builds the scoreboard projection
  agents/              the thirteen agents
  simulator/           the demo world, its timeline and its steward

examples/            the end-to-end walkthrough
scripts/             runnable stages and probes
scoreboard/          the Next.js scoreboard
tests/               the test suite

Tests

pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest -q

100 tests, no external services required.

How it works

TECHNICAL.md covers the internals: the claim convention that keeps Brier scoring uniform across claim types, the per-claim-type null probabilities, the Monte Carlo and FDR machinery, the reconstruction settlement rule and why survival is deliberately cheap evidence, and how meta claims settle off other claims.

License

Apache 2.0

A
license - permissive license
-
quality - not tested
B
maintenance

Maintenance

Maintainers
Response time
Release cycle
Releases (12mo)
Commit activity

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    -
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides fact-checking capabilities and truth anchoring for AI agents using verified data sources.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for AI agent trust verification, enabling agents to verify identities, check trust scores, and build reputation across multiple blockchain and web platforms.
    12
    6
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server that enables AI agents to verify each other's trust scores, register, submit reviews, and find trusted agents before transacting.
    4
    6
    MIT

View all related MCP servers

Related MCP Connectors

  • MCP server for AI agents to plan, verify, and deploy Cloudflare-native apps.

  • MCP server connecting AI agents to non-custodial staking data across 130+ networks.

  • MCP server providing access to the Scorecard API to evaluate and optimize LLM systems.

View all MCP Connectors

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cnpierrepapi/ledgerline-ai'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server