polaris-audit
Related Servers
Alternatives to polaris-audit
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenancePerforms comprehensive website health audits including SSL, DNS, email authentication, performance, uptime, and broken link checks, all without requiring API keys. Returns a scored report with weighted metrics and actionable recommendations.768 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAudits any website for SEO issues, providing scored health checks, schema validation, and performance analysis through AI assistants.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenancePassive website security and trust auditor that checks for security, SEO, AI surface, email, and other exposures, producing a score and remediation plan.-

uxlintofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAudits any site's UX the way a design-literate reviewer would — contrast, tap targets, type scale, colour discipline, scan patterns, copy — and returns the rule, the source line and the exact fix.6Apache 2.0- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceProvides comprehensive website auditing for SEO, performance, accessibility, and security using AI-powered analysis. It enables users to generate detailed audit reports and actionable improvement suggestions for any given URL.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables auditing any public website, returning a scored plain-English report that flags issues costing customers, covering speed, phone experience, search visibility, contact options, writing quality, and modernity.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: audit_url initiates a scan, get_scan_result retrieves results for a submitted scan, and get_public_result fetches publicly shared reports by UUID. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection unambiguous for an agent.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (audit_url, get_public_result, get_scan_result) using snake_case. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style or convention.
With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for an audit domain that might benefit from additional operations like listing scans, deleting results, or updating reports. However, the core workflow (submit, retrieve, fetch public) is covered, making it borderline but functional.
The tool set covers the essential lifecycle of submitting scans and retrieving results, including public reports. Minor gaps exist, such as no ability to list or manage scans, but agents can work around this by tracking tokens externally.