Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-library-search

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching public library catalogs for ebooks and audiobooks, comparing availability across libraries without login, and optionally linking an account to view and manage loans and holds.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive access to South Korea's National Library information system, enabling searches across 1,000+ public libraries, real-time book availability checks, borrowing trends, and location-based library discovery.
      27
      29 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search a university library's catalog by keyword, title, author, subject, or ISBN, and to check each copy's real-time availability, floor location, and expected return date. Also provides recommended reading lists, new arrivals, and search-term suggestions, with raw holdings data parsed into readable output.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multi-source search and verified download of public-domain and open-license ebooks (Chinese/English) through a unified MCP interface.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The three tools have clearly distinct purposes: search_books for keyword search, find_book_availability for branch-level availability, and get_book_detail for bibliographic details. Despite overlap in parameters (book_id, city), the descriptions and return types make the boundaries unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (search_books, find_book_availability, get_book_detail). The slight variation in verbs (search/find/get) is natural and consistent, not confusing.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is slightly lean but well-scoped for a library search server. Each tool earns its place, and there is no bloat. A few more tools (e.g., branch listing) could add value without being excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core search lifecycle: search, availability, and detail. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no way to list supported cities or browse branches), but these are workaroundable and not critical for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessOutdated data