mcp-cfdi-mx
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-cfdi-mx
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for Italian Electronic Invoicing (FatturaPA / SDI). Provide tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for Sistema di Interscambio (SDI) interoperability.4355 PyPI1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for Polish Electronic Invoicing (KSeF / FA(2)). Provides tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for KSeF interoperability.103Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for French Electronic Invoicing (NF XP Z12-013). Provide tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for PDP/OD interoperability.234Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for Spanish Electronic Invoicing. Provides tools to generate, validate, and submit invoices across VERI\*FACTU, Facturae/FACe, SII, TicketBAI, and Crea y Crece B2B.20115 PyPI2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for Singapore Electronic Invoicing (InvoiceNow / PINT-SG / Peppol 5-Corner Model). Provides tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for IRAS / Peppol interoperability.1745 PyPIApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for United Arab Emirates Electronic Invoicing (PINT AE / Peppol 5-Corner Model). Provides tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for FTA / Peppol interoperability.41766 PyPI1Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct pipeline stage: build (cfdi/pago), seal, validate, verify, and scope introspection. The only adjacent pair, build_cfdi and build_pago, is explicitly differentiated by document type (Ingreso/Egreso vs Complemento de Pagos). No overlapping purposes remain.
All tools use a consistent namespace prefix (mx__) plus a snake_case verb_noun pattern: build_cfdi, seal_cfdi, validate_cfdi, build_pago, verify_tfd, get_supported_scope. No mixing of conventions.
Six tools cleanly cover the described Phase-1 CFDI lifecycle without redundancy. Each tool earns its place and the count is well within the 3-15 ideal range.
The surface covers building (both document types), sealing, XSD validation, and TFD verification, which is a coherent end-to-end flow for the stated scope. PAC submission transport and later-phase complementos are deliberately absent, a minor gap agents must work around externally.