Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-cfdi-mx

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Italian Electronic Invoicing (FatturaPA / SDI). Provide tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for Sistema di Interscambio (SDI) interoperability.
      43
      55 PyPI
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Polish Electronic Invoicing (KSeF / FA(2)). Provides tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for KSeF interoperability.
      10
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for French Electronic Invoicing (NF XP Z12-013). Provide tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for PDP/OD interoperability.
      2
      34
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Spanish Electronic Invoicing. Provides tools to generate, validate, and submit invoices across VERI\*FACTU, Facturae/FACe, SII, TicketBAI, and Crea y Crece B2B.
      20
      115 PyPI
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Singapore Electronic Invoicing (InvoiceNow / PINT-SG / Peppol 5-Corner Model). Provides tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for IRAS / Peppol interoperability.
      17
      45 PyPI
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for United Arab Emirates Electronic Invoicing (PINT AE / Peppol 5-Corner Model). Provides tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for FTA / Peppol interoperability.
      4
      17
      66 PyPI
      1
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct pipeline stage: build (cfdi/pago), seal, validate, verify, and scope introspection. The only adjacent pair, build_cfdi and build_pago, is explicitly differentiated by document type (Ingreso/Egreso vs Complemento de Pagos). No overlapping purposes remain.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a consistent namespace prefix (mx__) plus a snake_case verb_noun pattern: build_cfdi, seal_cfdi, validate_cfdi, build_pago, verify_tfd, get_supported_scope. No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools cleanly cover the described Phase-1 CFDI lifecycle without redundancy. Each tool earns its place and the count is well within the 3-15 ideal range.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers building (both document types), sealing, XSD validation, and TFD verification, which is a coherent end-to-end flow for the stated scope. PAC submission transport and later-phase complementos are deliberately absent, a minor gap agents must work around externally.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues