Skip to main content
Glama
cmalpass

MCP Presidio

by cmalpass
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Presidio

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • pii-anonymizer

      kofi-sketch
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for automatic detection and redaction of PII in text, with anonymization and deanonymization capabilities, all local processing.
      1
      -

    • wardcat-mcp

      oguzhantopcu0
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing on-prem PII detection and anonymization tools (scan and is_sensitive) for AI agents, ensuring data stays local.
      4
      MIT

    • sensitive-info-mcp

      hawklithm
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AI-powered sensitive info detection and masking MCP server supporting 14+ types with regex, checksum, and optional LLM semantic detection, enabling flexible masking strategies like mask, replace, hash, and redact.
      6
      MIT

    • phi-redact-mcp

      Rinava
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that redacts PII/PHI from text before it ever reaches an LLM — self-hosted, fail-closed, and HIPAA-aware.
      3
      MIT

    • pii-mcp

      nephilimdie
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for anonymizing and deanonymizing PII through the Pseudora API, enabling safe sharing of sensitive text with AI assistants.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. The tools are well-organized into categories: custom recognizer management (add_custom_recognizer), analysis (analyze_text, analyze_structured_data, batch_analyze), anonymization (anonymize_text, anonymize_structured_data, batch_anonymize), metadata retrieval (get_supported_entities, get_anonymization_operators), and validation (validate_detection). Each tool serves a unique function within the PII processing workflow.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout. All tools use snake_case with clear action-object naming: add_custom_recognizer, analyze_text, anonymize_structured_data, batch_analyze, get_supported_entities, validate_detection. The naming convention is perfectly uniform across all 10 tools, making them predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 10 tools, this server is well-scoped for PII detection and anonymization. Each tool earns its place by covering essential operations: analysis (single, structured, batch), anonymization (single, structured, batch), configuration (custom recognizers), metadata (entities, operators), and validation. The count is appropriate for the domain without being overwhelming or insufficient.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides complete coverage for PII processing workflows. It includes all necessary CRUD-like operations: adding custom recognizers, analyzing text/structured data (individually and in batch), anonymizing with various operators (individually and in batch), retrieving metadata about supported entities and operators, and validating detection accuracy. There are no obvious gaps that would hinder agent workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources