get_comments
Retrieve all comments for a specific 3D design on Cults3D by providing its unique slug identifier.
Instructions
Get all comments on a specific design.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes |
Retrieve all comments for a specific 3D design on Cults3D by providing its unique slug identifier.
Get all comments on a specific design.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description implies a read operation but lacks details on pagination, sorting, or limits. Without annotations, more disclosure is expected, but the simple 'Get all comments' is not misleading.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, concise sentence that is front-loaded and contains no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While the description covers the core function, it omits common details like pagination and error cases. For a simple read tool it is adequate but not thorough.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, and the description only indirectly explains that 'slug' identifies a specific design. No format, example, or source for the slug is provided.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb ('Get'), resource ('comments'), and context ('on a specific design'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like reply_to_comment.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as reply_to_comment or list_my_designs. No prerequisites or conditions are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/clugtu/cults3d-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server