A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceProduction-grade MCP server for enterprise Azure cost optimization, enabling spend anomaly detection, multi-tenant auditing, budget validation, and compliance-aware recommendations.
1
MIT
cloudsealed-mcp
Officialby cloudsealed
Related Servers
Alternatives to cloudsealed-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for tracking and managing costs per AI agent, with budget alerts, anomaly detection, and model cost comparison.25 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for AI agent compliance that screens actions before execution and records decisions in an immutable, SIEM-ready audit trail.49 npm-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for AI economy infrastructure with built-in EU AI Act compliance, supporting risk management, transparency, and bias detection.10MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceCloud cost management MCP server for Azure. Ask your AI about your cloud bill.1535 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for UK AI Bill 2026 compliance, implementing a 5-principles framework (Safety, Transparency, Fairness, Accountability, Contestability) to help audit and classify AI systems.73 PyPIMIT
TDQS
A4.7/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools address completely different domains—architecture risk scoring and billing waste analysis. Each description explicitly references the other as the tool not to use for the wrong scenario, leaving no ambiguity about their distinct purposes.
Naming Consistency5/5
Both tools follow the consistent pattern `cloudsealed_<verb>_<noun>` using snake_case, with verbs 'score' and 'analyze' clearly indicating actions. Naming is uniform and predictable.
Tool Count3/5
With only two tools, the server feels thin. While each tool is substantial and covers a distinct need, the overall scope is narrow for a server named 'cloudsealed-mcp', making it borderline.
Completeness3/5
The two tools cover their specific analysis tasks well, but the server lacks supporting operations such as fetching cloud data or handling remediation. The billing tool requires the user to supply CSV data, and there's no way to act on the findings, leaving notable gaps.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues