Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to GnosisLab

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI-assisted scientific research workflow management through MCP, including project creation, ideation, experiment execution, and artifact handling, with integration for ChatGPT, Codex, and Claude Code.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that enforces evidence-graded, phase-gated, peer-reviewed research workflows for AI agents to conduct rigorous decision-making.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An append-only research operations framework and read-only MCP that tracks research plans, approvals, observations, claims, failures, revisions, and contributions with source-grounded evidence, providing search, evidence fetch, and audit capabilities without direct ledger writes.
      30
      64 PyPI
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic, harness-neutral research workflows by unifying research object identity, evidence receipts, claim-evidence graphs, and append-only decision logs, along with specialized scholarly skills for literature analysis, reproducibility audits, and multi-agent review.
      29 PyPI
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables automated scientific paper analysis, citation credibility verification, consensus ratio calculation, and multi-hop research queries through the Model Context Protocol, integrating with MCP-compliant clients.
      8
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 46 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct resources and lifecycle stages (programme/hypothesis/trial/candidate/contract/archive/blob). A few boundaries blur: list_active_programmes vs list_programmes, describe_blob vs get_blob, and the terminal-status cluster (mark_retryable, correct_trial_status, cancel_trial) require reading descriptions to separate. Descriptions do resolve the ambiguity, but an agent could misselect without care.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Strong overall verb_noun snake_case convention (create_programme, conclude_hypothesis, record_observation, cancel_trial). Minor deviations: the get_ vs describe_ vs read_ prefix split (describe_blob/get_blob, read_resource) is semantically inconsistent, and capture_bundle vs capture_bundle_from_code_hash is a long variant. Still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    46 tools is heavy for a single server, exceeding the 25+ threshold for concern. While the domain is genuinely broad (research loop + archives + integrity + blob store), operations like capture_pending_artifacts and archive_pending_programmes are migration one-offs that could be folded, and the trial-status family could be consolidated.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full research lifecycle: programme creation/closing, hypothesis formulate/conclude/abandon, experiment design/run/observe, candidate registration and lineage, evaluation contracts, promotion decisions, data prep/verify, archiving/verification, integrity auditing, and a resource/blob read path. Few obvious gaps remain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues