get_latest_failed_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that it returns the most recent failed task or a message if none, but does not explicitly state that it is read-only or mention any side effects. Since no annotations are provided, more transparency would be beneficial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with Args and Returns sections. It is efficient but could be slightly more structured (e.g., bullet points). No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the main functionality and mentions return types. Given the tool simplicity and existence of an output schema, it is adequate but lacks details on error handling (e.g., invalid project_id).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds a one-line explanation for 'project_id' ('ID of the project'), but the schema has 0% description coverage. More detail about the parameter (e.g., required, valid range) would improve clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Get the most recent failed task for a project', which is a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from siblings like 'get_task' and 'filter_tasks' by focusing on the latest failed task.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., 'filter_tasks', 'analyze_task_failure'). There is no mention of prerequisites or context for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.