Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Linear

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables reading and managing Linear issues by human-readable ID, with tools for searching, creating, updating, commenting, and resolving teams, states, labels, and assignees by name.
      11
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to interact with Linear's issue tracking system, including creating, updating, searching issues, adding comments, and accessing resources via the Linear API.
      788 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Linear's API to manage issues, projects, and teams. Supports creating, updating, searching, and deleting issues, along with project management and team operations through API key authentication.
      13
      280 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with Linear workspaces by listing, retrieving, creating, and searching issues, and listing teams via the Linear GraphQL API.
      2 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct by resource and action (e.g., issues vs. projects vs. milestones). The few potentially confusable pairs are singular/plural variants like create_issue/create_issues and delete_issue/delete_issues, but the plural forms clearly indicate bulk operations.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a consistent linear_ prefix followed by snake_case verb_noun patterns (e.g., create_issue, search_projects, get_project_milestones). The singular/plural distinction is applied uniformly, and there are no mixed conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 22 tools, the count falls into the borderline-heavy range (16-25). However, the coverage spans multiple subdomains (issues, projects, milestones, comments, auth, teams, user), so the count is defensible but feels slightly high for an MCP server.

    Completeness3/5

    Issues have create, update (bulk), delete, and search, but no single-issue get; projects support create/get/search but not update or delete; comments only support get and create. These are notable gaps in lifecycle coverage for the core resources.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive