chaprola_sort

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses a critical behavioral trait: 'Modifies the file in place', which signals mutation and potential destructiveness. However, it doesn't mention reversibility, required permissions, error behaviors, or how multiple sort fields are prioritized, leaving notable gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero waste. The first sentence states the core functionality, the second notes the side effect. It is front-loaded and every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a moderately complex tool (sort_by with directional and type options), the description is minimal. It explains the overall action and side effect but does not elaborate on sort priority, type handling, or file format. The schema covers parameter structure, but the tool's behavior beyond 'in place' is under-specified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the three parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no extra semantics beyond what the schema already provides; it just says 'by one or more fields' which aligns with sort_by. No additional meaning is provided for file or project.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Sort' and identifies 'a data file' as the resource, with the detail 'by one or more fields'. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like chaprola_merge or chaprola_format, and the second sentence adds a key qualifier about in-place modification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by stating the action and resource, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention any exclusions or prerequisites. Since the purpose is obvious, it's not completely vague, but it lacks direct guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.